not requiring a PioInstance for splitting lets us split from a
PeripheralRef or borrowed PIO as well, mirroring every other peripheral
in embassy_rp. pio pins still have to be constructed from owned pin
instances for now.
merge into PioInstance instead. PioPeripheral was mostly a wrapper
around PioInstance anyway, and the way the wrapping was done required
PioInstanceBase<N> types where PIO{N} could've been used instead.
1423: rp: fix gpio InputFuture and inefficiencies r=pennae a=pennae
InputFuture could not wait for edges without breaking due to a broken From impl, but even if the impl had been correct it would not have worked correctly because raw edge interrupts are sticky and must be cleared from software. also replace critical sections with atomic accesses, and do nvic setup only once.
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
doing this setup work repeatedly, on every wait, is unnecessary. with
nothing ever disabling the interrupt it is sufficient to enable it once
during device init and never touch it again.
pio control registers are notionally shared between state machines as
well. state machine operations that change these registers must use
atomic accesses (or critical sections, which would be overkill).
notably PioPin::set_input_sync_bypass was even wrong, enabling the
bypass on a pin requires the corresponding bit to be set (not cleared).
the PioCommon function got it right.
add an hd44780 example for pio. hd44780 with busy polling is a pretty
complicated protocol if the busy polling is to be done by the
peripheral, and this example exercises many pio features that we don't
have good examples for yet.
1422: rp: remove leftovers from #1414 r=Dirbaio a=pennae
forgot to remove these when they were no longer necessary or useful. oops.
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
fixing the dma word size to 32 makes it impossible to implement any
peripheral that takes its data in smaller chunks, eg uart, spi, i2c,
ws2812, the list goes on.
compiler barriers were also not set correctly; we need a SeqCst barrier
before starting a transfer as well to avoid reordering of accesses into
a buffer after dma has started.
InputFuture did not use and check edge interrupts correctly.
InterruptTrigger should've checked for not 1,2,3,4 but 1,2,4,8 since the
inte fields are bitmasks, and not clearing INTR would have repeatedly
triggered edge interrupts early.
1404: feat(stm32): Add DMA based, ring-buffer based rx uart, v3 r=Dirbaio a=rmja
This PR replaces #1150. Comparing to that PR, this one has the following changes:
* The implementation now aligns with the new stm32 dma module, thanks `@Dirbaio!`
* Calls to `read()` now returns on either 1) idle line, or 2) ring buffer is at most half full. This is different from the previous pr, which would return a lot of 1 byte reads. Thank you `@chemicstry` for making me realize that it was actually not what I wanted. This is accomplished using half-transfer completed and full-transfer completed interrupts. Both seems to be supported on both dma and bdma.
The implementation still have the issue mentioned here: https://github.com/embassy-rs/embassy/pull/1150#discussion_r1094627035
Regarding the todos here: https://github.com/embassy-rs/embassy/pull/1150#issuecomment-1513905925. I have removed the exposure of ndtr from `dma::RingBuffer` to the uart so that the uart now simply calls `ringbuf::reload_position()` to align the position within the ring buffer to that of the actual running dma controller. BDMA and GPDMA is not implemented. I do not have any chips with those dma controllers, so maybe someone else should to this so that it can be tested.
The `saturate_serial` test utility inside `tests/utils` has an `--idles` switch which can be used to saturate the uart from a pc, but with random idles.
Because embassy-stm32 now can have tests, we should probably run them in ci. I do this locally to test the DmaRingBuffer: `cargo test --no-default-features --features stm32f429ig`.
cc `@chemicstry` `@Dirbaio`
Co-authored-by: Rasmus Melchior Jacobsen <rmja@laesoe.org>
Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
1376: rtc: cleanup and consolidate r=Dirbaio a=xoviat
This removes an extra file that I left in, adds an example, and consolidates the files into one 'v2' file.
Co-authored-by: xoviat <xoviat@users.noreply.github.com>
1414: rp: report errors from buffered and dma uart receives r=Dirbaio a=pennae
neither of these reported errors so far, which is not ideal. add error reporting to both of them that matches the blocking error reporting as closely as is feasible, even allowing partial receives from buffered uarts before errors are reported where they would have been by the blocking code. dma transfers don't do this, if an errors applies to any byte in a transfer the entire transfer is nuked (though we probably could report how many bytes have been transferred).
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
this reports errors at the same location the blocking uart would, which
works out to being mostly exact (except in the case of overruns, where
one extra character is dropped). this is actually easier than going
nuclear in the case of errors and nuking both the buffer contents and
the rx fifo, both of which are things we'd have to do in addition to
what's added here, and neither are needed for correctness.
sending break conditions is necessary to implement some protocols, and
the hardware supports this natively. we do have to make sure that we
don't assert a break condition while the uart is busy though, otherwise
the break may be inserted before the last character in the tx fifo.
1395: rp/pio: bit of a rework r=Dirbaio a=pennae
the pio module is currently in a Bit of a State. this is far from all that's needed to make it more useful, but it's a start.
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
the rp uart receive fifo is 32 entries deep, so the 31 byte test data
fits into it without needing any buffering. extend to 48 bytes to fill
the entire fifo and the 16 byte test buffer.
instruction memory is a shared resource. writing it only from PioCommon
clarifies this, and perhaps makes it more obvious that multiple state
machines can share the same instructions.
this also allows *freeing* of instruction memory to reprogram the
system, although this interface is not entirely safe yet. it's safe in
the sense rusts understands things, but state machines may misbehave if
their instruction memory is freed and rewritten while they are running.
fixing this is out of scope for now since it requires some larger
changes to how state machines are handled. the interface provided
currently is already unsafe in that it lets people execute instruction
memory that has never been written, so this isn't much of a drawback for now.
pin and irq operations affect the entire pio block. with pins this is
not very problematic since pins themselves are resources, but irqs are
not treated like that and can thus interfere across state machines. the
ability to wait for an irq on a state machine is kept to make
synchronization with user code easier, and since we can't inspect loaded
programs at build time we wouldn't gain much from disallowing waits from
state machines anyway.
