542: nrf/gpiote: remove PortInput, move impls to Input/FlexPin. r=Dirbaio a=Dirbaio
`PortInput` is just a dumb wrapper around `Input`, it has no reason whatsoever to exist. This PR moves the `wait_for_x` functionality to `Input` directly.
It also adds it to `FlexPin` for completeness and consistency with `Input`.
(The reason `PortInput` exists is a while ago `GPIOTE` was an owned singleton that you had to initialize, so `PortInput::new()` would require it to enforce it's been initialized. This doesn't apply anymore now that GPIOTE is "global")
Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
As per Tokio and others, this commit provides a `poll_flush` method on `AsyncWrite` so that a best-effort attempt at wakening once all bytes are flushed can be made.
The constructors themselves are not strictly unsafe. Interactions with DMA can be generally unsafe if a future is dropped, but that's a separate issue. It is important that we use the `unsafe` keyword diligently as it can lead to confusion otherwise.
486: Pwm ppi events r=Dirbaio a=jacobrosenthal
More PWM yak shaving. I was going to do some safe pwm ppi events stuff but I just dont think it fits this api design.. ppi is just very low level, im not sure how safe it will be in general
* first we should probably have borrows of handlers for ppi with lifetime of the peripheral? hal does eb4ba6ae42/nrf-hal-common/src/pwm.rs (L714-L716)
* in general having access to tasks can put the state in some configuration the api doesnt understand anymore. for `SequencePwm` ideally id hand you back either only seq_start0 or seq_start1 because youd only use one based on if your `Times` is even or odd.. but again we only know that with this api AFTER start has been called. I dont think were ready for typestates
SO I figured why not add the pwm ppi events but make them unsafe and commit this example since I started it.
Somewhat related drop IS removing the last duty cycle from the pin correctly, but stop DOES NOT..the only thing that sets the pin back is pin.conf() as far as I can tell, so I tried to document that better and got rid of stop for the `SimplePwm` again since that doesnt need it then. However its ackward we dont have a way to unset the pwm without setting a new sequence of 0s, or dropping the peripheral
Co-authored-by: Jacob Rosenthal <jacobrosenthal@gmail.com>
455: simple_playback api from nrf sdk r=Dirbaio a=jacobrosenthal
Port of the nrf_drv_pwm_simple_playback call from the nordic sdk that allows you to set up a sequence to play across leds with no interaction necessary using the 'shorts' registers to trigger looping sequences
Co-authored-by: Jacob Rosenthal <jacobrosenthal@gmail.com>
Moving `new_*` to the version-specific mod allows doing the correct
register writes right there in `new`, without needing abstractions
like `enable_all`/`disable_all`.
- Scary pointer math is now contained in the tasks and events
- ppi now sets the tasks and events immediately and the struct is now zero-sized
- StaticToOne is renamed to ZeroToOne
- Used DPPI tasks and events now panic when enabled twice
- Removed ConfigurableChannel and added capacity numbers to the channels
- Replaced the PPI api with a new one using the DPPI terminology (publish & subscribe)
- Updated all tasks and event registers for DPPI
The buffer will always have been filled and we never explicitly stop the task outside of this code. Thus, we can assume the number of bytes in the slice.
