CI was not building the a.rs application due to the requirement of b.bin
having been built first. Add a feature flag to examples so that CI can
build them including a dummy application.
Update a.rs application examples so that they compile again.
- Move typelevel interrupts to a special-purpose mod: `embassy_xx::interrupt::typelevel`.
- Reexport the PAC interrupt enum in `embassy_xx::interrupt`.
This has a few advantages:
- The `embassy_xx::interrupt` module is now more "standard".
- It works with `cortex-m` functions for manipulating interrupts, for example.
- It works with RTIC.
- the interrupt enum allows holding value that can be "any interrupt at runtime", this can't be done with typelevel irqs.
- When "const-generics on enums" is stable, we can remove the typelevel interrupts without disruptive changes to `embassy_xx::interrupt`.
1471: embassy-net: Make TcpSocket::abort() async r=Dirbaio a=mkj
This lets callers ensure that the reset packet is sent to the remote host. Otherwise there isn't a way to wait for the smoltcp stack to send the reset.
Requires changes to smoltcp to wake after the reset has been sent, see https://github.com/smoltcp-rs/smoltcp/compare/master...mkj:smoltcp:abort-wake
This commit also adds a "TCP accept" demo of the problem. Without the `.await` for abort() it gets dropped before the RST packet is emitted.
Co-authored-by: Matt Johnston <matt@ucc.asn.au>
1340: Add I2S for f4 r=Dirbaio a=xoviat
This is only for f4, but it puts us equal to or ahead of the standard rust hal.
1474: stm32: Fix watchdog timeout computation r=Dirbaio a=rmja
Co-authored-by: xoviat <xoviat@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rasmus Melchior Jacobsen <rmja@laesoe.org>
1457: TL Mbox read and write for stm32wb r=xoviat a=OueslatiGhaith
Hello,
This pull request is related to #1397 and #1401, inspired by #24, built upon the work done in #1405 and #1424, and was tested on an stm32wb55rg.
This pull request aims to add read and write functionality to the TL mailbox for stm32wb microcontrollers
Co-authored-by: goueslati <ghaith.oueslati@habemus.com>
Co-authored-by: xoviat <xoviat@users.noreply.github.com>
exposing pac items kind of undermines the unstable-pac feature. directly
exposing register structure is also pretty inconvenient since the clock
switching code takes care of the src/aux difference in behavior, so a
user needn't really be forced to write down decomposed register values.
1458: rp: remove take!, add bind_interrupts! r=Dirbaio a=pennae
both of the uart interrupts now check a flag that only the dma rx path ever sets (and now unsets again on drop) to return early if it's not as they expect. this is ... not our preferred solution, but if bind_interrupts *must* allow mutiple handlers to be specified then this is the only way we can think of that doesn't break uarts.
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
It was intended to allow changing baudrate on shared spi/i2c. There's no
advantage in using it for PWM or PIO, and makes it less usable because you have to
have `embassy-embedded-hal` as a dep to use it.
1424: add TL maibox for stm32wb r=xoviat a=OueslatiGhaith
Hello,
This pull request is related to #1397 and #1401, inspired by #24, build upon the work done in #1405, and was tested on an stm32wb55rg.
This pull request aims to add the transport layer mailbox for stm32wb microcontrollers. For now it's only capable of initializing it and getting the firmware information
Co-authored-by: goueslati <ghaith.oueslati@habemus.com>
Co-authored-by: Ghaith Oueslati <73850124+OueslatiGhaith@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xoviat <xoviat@users.noreply.github.com>
execution wraps around after the end of instruction memory and wrapping
works with this, so we may as well allow program loading across this
boundary. could be useful for reusing chunks of instruction memory.
the many individual sets aren't very efficient, and almost no checks
were done to ensure that the configuration written to the hardware was
actually valid. this adresses both of these.
programs contain information we could pull from them directly and use to
validate other configuration of the state machine instead of asking the
user to pull them out and hand them to us bit by bit. unfortunately
programs do not specify how many in or out bits they use, so we can only
handle side-set and wrapping jumps like this. it's still something though.
it's only any good for PioPin because there it follows a pattern of gpio
pin alternate functions being named like that, everything else can just
as well be referred to as `pio::Thing`
1429: rp pio, √9 r=Dirbaio a=pennae
another mix of refactoring and soundness issues. most notably pio pins are now checked for being actually accessible to the pio blocks, are constructible from not just the owned peripherals but refs as well, and have their registrations to the pio block reverted once all state machines and the common block has been dropped.
state machines are now also stopped when dropped, and concurrent rx+tx using dma can finally be done in a sound manner. previously it was possible to do, but allowed users to start two concurrent transfers to the same fifo using different dma channels, which obviously would not have the expected results on average.
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
this *finally* allows sound implementions of bidirectional transfers
without blocking. the futures previously allowed only a single direction
to be active at any given time, and the dma transfers didn't take a
mutable reference and were thus unsound.
we can only have one active waiter for any given irq at any given time.
allowing waits for irqs on state machines bypasses this limitation and
causes lost events for all but the latest waiter for a given irq.
splitting this out also allows us to signal from state machines to other
parts of the application without monopolizing state machine access for
the irq wait, as would be necessary to make irq waiting sound.
move all methods into PioStateMachine instead. the huge trait wasn't
object-safe and thus didn't have any benefits whatsoever except for
making it *slightly* easier to write bounds for passing around state
machines. that would be much better solved with generics-less instances.
1425: rp pio, round 2 r=Dirbaio a=pennae
another round of bugfixes for pio, and some refactoring. in the end we'd like to make pio look like all the other modules and not expose traits that provide all the methods of a type, but put them onto the type itself. traits only make much sense, even if we added an AnyPio and merged the types for the member state machines (at the cost of at least a u8 per member of Pio).
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
not requiring a PioInstance for splitting lets us split from a
PeripheralRef or borrowed PIO as well, mirroring every other peripheral
in embassy_rp. pio pins still have to be constructed from owned pin
instances for now.
merge into PioInstance instead. PioPeripheral was mostly a wrapper
around PioInstance anyway, and the way the wrapping was done required
PioInstanceBase<N> types where PIO{N} could've been used instead.
add an hd44780 example for pio. hd44780 with busy polling is a pretty
complicated protocol if the busy polling is to be done by the
peripheral, and this example exercises many pio features that we don't
have good examples for yet.
1376: rtc: cleanup and consolidate r=Dirbaio a=xoviat
This removes an extra file that I left in, adds an example, and consolidates the files into one 'v2' file.
Co-authored-by: xoviat <xoviat@users.noreply.github.com>
1414: rp: report errors from buffered and dma uart receives r=Dirbaio a=pennae
neither of these reported errors so far, which is not ideal. add error reporting to both of them that matches the blocking error reporting as closely as is feasible, even allowing partial receives from buffered uarts before errors are reported where they would have been by the blocking code. dma transfers don't do this, if an errors applies to any byte in a transfer the entire transfer is nuked (though we probably could report how many bytes have been transferred).
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
instruction memory is a shared resource. writing it only from PioCommon
clarifies this, and perhaps makes it more obvious that multiple state
machines can share the same instructions.
this also allows *freeing* of instruction memory to reprogram the
system, although this interface is not entirely safe yet. it's safe in
the sense rusts understands things, but state machines may misbehave if
their instruction memory is freed and rewritten while they are running.
fixing this is out of scope for now since it requires some larger
changes to how state machines are handled. the interface provided
currently is already unsafe in that it lets people execute instruction
memory that has never been written, so this isn't much of a drawback for now.
pin and irq operations affect the entire pio block. with pins this is
not very problematic since pins themselves are resources, but irqs are
not treated like that and can thus interfere across state machines. the
ability to wait for an irq on a state machine is kept to make
synchronization with user code easier, and since we can't inspect loaded
programs at build time we wouldn't gain much from disallowing waits from
state machines anyway.
- probe-run screwed up the last release 2 weeks ago and it's still not fixed (issue 391). Doesn't look well maintained.
- Even when it's not broken, it lags behind probe-rs-cli in new chips support because it's slow in updating probe-rs.
1379: enable inline-asm feature for cortex-m in examples r=Dirbaio a=pennae
inline assembly is supported since rust 1.59, we're way past that. enabling this makes the compiled code more compact, and on rp2040 even decreses memory usage by not needing thunks in sram.
Co-authored-by: pennae <github@quasiparticle.net>
inline assembly is supported since rust 1.59, we're way past that.
enabling this makes the compiled code more compact, and on rp2040
even decreses memory usage by not needing thunks in sram.
1369: Lora AFIT r=Dirbaio a=Dirbaio
Extracted out of #1367
Probably we should wait until `rust-lorawan` is merged+released?
Co-authored-by: Ulf Lilleengen <lulf@redhat.com>
1371: RTC r=Dirbaio a=xoviat
This adds RTC for most of the stm32 chips. Nearly all of the work was not done by me, but I took it the last bit by disabling the chips that weren't working. I think it would be easier to enable them in future PRs if requested.
1374: stm32: remove TIMX singleton when used on timer driver r=Dirbaio a=xoviat
After multiple ways of looking at this, this is the best solution I could think of.
Co-authored-by: Mathias <mk@blackbird.online>
Co-authored-by: xoviat <xoviat@users.noreply.github.com>
1330: stm32/pwm: add complementary pwm r=Dirbaio a=xoviat
This implements complementary PWM with dead time on many supported targets. The specific dead-time programming functions are passed through directly to the user, which is a bit ugly but the best compromise I could reach for now.
Co-authored-by: xoviat <xoviat@users.noreply.github.com>
1333: STM32: Adc V1 r=Dirbaio a=GrantM11235
Based on #947
Co-authored-by: Matthew W. Samsonoff <matt.samsonoff@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Grant Miller <GrantM11235@gmail.com>
1321: executor: add Pender, rework Cargo features. r=Dirbaio a=Dirbaio
This introduces a `Pender` struct with enum cases for thread-mode, interrupt-mode and
custom callback executors. This avoids calls through function pointers when using only
the thread or interrupt executors. Faster, and friendlier to `cargo-call-stack`.
`embassy-executor` now has `arch-xxx` Cargo features to select the arch and to enable
the builtin executors (thread and interrupt).
Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
1313: (embassy-stm32): rework bufferedUart to get rid of PeripheralMutex r=Dirbaio a=MathiasKoch
New implementation is very similar to the implementation of embassy-nrf & embassy-rp.
Also adds embedded-hal traits to bufferedUart.
**NB**: Still needs testing on actual hardware
Co-authored-by: Mathias <mk@blackbird.online>
This introduces a `Pender` struct with enum cases for thread-mode, interrupt-mode and
custom callback executors. This avoids calls through function pointers when using only
the thread or interrupt executors. Faster, and friendlier to `cargo-call-stack`.
`embassy-executor` now has `arch-xxx` Cargo features to select the arch and to enable
the builtin executors (thread and interrupt).
This example also uses a pio program compiled at runtime, rather than one built at compile time. There's no reason to do that, but it's probably useful to have an example that does this as well.
> dirbaio: so I was checking how zephyr does UARTE RX on nRF
> dirbaio: because currently we have the ugly "restart DMA on line idle to flush it" hack
> dirbaio: because according to the docs "For each byte received over the RXD line, an RXDRDY event will be generated. This event is likely to occur before the corresponding data has been transferred to Data RAM."
> dirbaio: so as I understood it, the only way to guarantee the data is actually transferred to RAM is to stop+restart DMA
> dirbaio: well, guess what?
> dirbaio: they just count RXDRDY's, and process that amount of data without restarting DMA
> dirbaio: with a timer configured as counter https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/drivers/serial/uart_nrfx_uarte.c#L650-L692
> dirbaio: 🤔🤷⁉️
> dirbaio: someone saying you can do the "hook up rxdrdy to a counter" trick, someone else saying it's wrong 🤪https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/28420/uarte-in-circular-mode
So we're going to do just that!
- BufferedUarte is lock-free now. No PeripheralMutex.
- The "restart DMA on line idle to flush it" hack is GONE. This means
- It'll work correctly without RTS/CTS now.
- It'll have better throughput when using RTS/CTS.
The UARTETWISPIn naming is quite horrible. With the nRF53, Nordic realized this
and renamed the interrupts to SERIALn. Let's copy that for our peripheral names, in nrf53 and nrf91.
They're used to communicate from the app to ST's OTA bootloader. See AN5247.
This bootloader is optional, must be flashed by the user, and requires changing the FLASH start address as well, so the current memory regions still require modifications to use it. Therefore there's no point in reserving these words.
Thanks @adamgreig for investigating the purpose.
